Edge of the solar system

Nemesis

A dim star proposed to circle the Sun far beyond the planets, sending comets towards Earth

Hypothetical; ruled out as a red dwarf Artist's impression · drag to rotate
Status hypothetical a red dwarf companion is ruled out by full-sky surveys [11]
Proposed April 1984 two papers in the same issue of Nature [1]
Extinction cycle 26 million years 12 extinctions over 250 million years (Raup & Sepkoski) [4]
Proposed orbit about 1.5 light-years about 88 000 to 95 000 AU [5]
Proposed object a red dwarf or a brown dwarf magnitude 7 to 12 in Muller's version [5]
WISE search, 2014 no Jupiter-mass brown dwarf to 26 000 AU no Jupiter-like planet to 82 000 AU [6]
Compared with Planet Nine about 110 to 220 times farther out Planet Nine: about 400 to 800 AU [12]

About the image. Drawn as a small, dull red star alone in the dark, with the Sun as one bright point in the distance. Nemesis has never been detected, so everything in the picture is imagined; only the idea of a dim red or brown dwarf about 1.5 light-years from the Sun comes from the 1984 proposals.

Nemesis is a star that may never have existed: a dim companion of the Sun, proposed in 1984 to explain why mass extinctions on Earth seemed to come in a regular rhythm. Its orbit would carry it about 1.5 light-years out, far beyond the planets, and every 26 million years it would pass through the Oort cloud of comets, knocking some of them inward. A few of those comets would hit Earth.

The extinction clock

In 1984 the palaeontologists Raup and Sepkoski looked at the fossil record of marine life and found 12 extinction events over the past 250 million years, spaced on average 26 million years apart. That regularity needed a cause. Soon after, two teams proposed one in the same issue of Nature. Davis, Hut and Muller, and separately Whitmire and Jackson, suggested that the Sun has an unseen companion on a wide orbit, and that its passages through the Oort cloud set off comet showers.

Muller thought Nemesis was most likely a red dwarf, a small, faint star of magnitude 7 to 12 as seen from Earth: too faint for the eye, but bright enough to sit unnoticed among thousands of catalogued stars. His group set out to examine 3 000 candidate stars. Whitmire and Jackson favoured a brown dwarf, a failed star even dimmer than a red dwarf.

The infrared surveys that followed found nothing. The most thorough was NASA’s WISE, which mapped the whole sky in infrared light. In 2014 Luhman reported that it ruled out a Jupiter-mass brown dwarf out to 26 000 AU, and a planet like Jupiter out to 82 000 AU. “The outer solar system probably does not contain a large gas giant planet, or a small, companion star,” he said. A red dwarf Nemesis is now ruled out by full-sky surveys.

The clock itself

The extinction rhythm that Nemesis was invented for is now disputed in its own right. In 2010 Melott and Bambach found a 27-million-year cycle in the fossil record, but so regular over half a billion years that a star like Nemesis, whose orbit would be disturbed by passing stars, could not be its cause. In 2011 Bailer-Jones found no periodic pattern in the ages of impact craters at all. In 2020 Rampino and colleagues found a 27.5-million-year cycle in the extinctions of land animals. The debate goes on without Nemesis.

Not Planet Nine

Nemesis is often confused with Planet Nine, but they are different ideas. Planet Nine is a proposed planet of about 5 to 10 Earth masses, 400 to 800 AU from the Sun, invoked to explain the clustered orbits of distant icy bodies. Nemesis would be a star more than a hundred times farther out.

There may have been a real Nemesis once. In 2017 Sadavoy and Stahler concluded from young stars in the Perseus cloud that most stars are born in wide pairs that break apart within a million years. “Yes, there probably was a Nemesis, a long time ago,” Stahler said. If so, the Sun’s twin drifted away into the galaxy billions of years ago.

Gallery

A dull red star with a few dark spots on its surface hangs in black space among faint stars, with one small yellow-white point far off at the upper right, an impression of the hypothetical star Nemesis with the distant Sun. AI-generated painting.
Dark, lumpy comet nuclei lit dimly in red drifting through black space, one trailing a tiny blue tail, below a glowing red star, an impression of comets in the outer Solar System near the hypothetical star Nemesis. AI-generated painting.
Nemesis, 3D artist's impression, rendered from the interactive model.
Nemesis, 3D artist's impression, from another angle, rendered from the interactive model.
Nemesis, 3D artist's impression, close-up, rendered from the interactive model.

Timeline

  1. 1984 Raup and Sepkoski report 12 extinctions spaced about 26 million years apart.
  2. 1984 Two papers in the same issue of Nature propose a companion star of the Sun as the cause.
  3. 2010 Melott and Bambach find the extinction cycle too regular for Nemesis to drive it.
  4. 2014 NASA's WISE survey finds no companion: no Jupiter-mass brown dwarf to 26 000 AU.
  5. 2017 A study suggests most stars are born in wide pairs, so the Sun may once have had a twin.

Questions people ask

Does the Sun have a twin star?

No companion has been found. NASA's WISE survey ruled out a Jupiter-mass brown dwarf out to 26 000 AU, and full-sky surveys have ruled out a red dwarf. The Sun may have been born with one that drifted away long ago.

What is the Nemesis theory?

A 1984 proposal that a dim companion star, about 1.5 light-years out, passes through the Oort cloud every 26 million years and sends showers of comets towards Earth, causing mass extinctions. Neither the star nor the strict rhythm has been confirmed.

Is Nemesis the same as Planet Nine?

No. Nemesis would be a star roughly 90 000 AU away, proposed to explain extinctions. Planet Nine is a proposed planet of 5 to 10 Earth masses at about 400 to 800 AU, proposed to explain the orbits of distant icy bodies.

Sources

  1. Wikipedia: Nemesis (hypothetical star)
  2. Davis, Hut & Muller (1984), Extinction of species by periodic comet showers, Nature 308, 715
  3. Whitmire & Jackson (1984), Are periodic mass extinctions driven by a distant solar companion?, Nature 308, 713
  4. Raup & Sepkoski (1984), Periodicity of extinctions in the geologic past, PNAS 81, 801
  5. Richard A. Muller: Nemesis (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)
  6. Luhman (2014), A Search for a Distant Companion to the Sun with the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, ApJ 781, 4
  7. NASA JPL (2014), NASA's WISE Survey Finds Thousands of New Stars, But No 'Planet X'
  8. Melott & Bambach (2010), Nemesis Reconsidered, MNRAS Letters 407, L99
  9. Bailer-Jones (2011), Bayesian time series analysis of terrestrial impact cratering, MNRAS 416, 1163
  10. Rampino, Caldeira & Zhu (2020), A 27.5-My underlying periodicity detected in extinction episodes of non-marine tetrapods, Historical Biology
  11. Philippov & Chobanu (2016), Nemesis, Tyche, Planet Nine Hypotheses. I. Can We Detect the Bodies Using Gravitational Lensing?, PASA 33, e033
  12. Batygin, Adams, Brown & Becker (2019), The Planet Nine Hypothesis, Physics Reports 805, 1
  13. UC Berkeley (2017), New evidence that all stars are born in pairs (Sadavoy & Stahler, MNRAS)