Announced15 April 2020found in reanalysed Kepler data[2]
About the image. Drawn as an Earth-sized rocky planet with a thin atmosphere and scattered clouds, lit by a small red star. Only its size and orbit have been measured. Its atmosphere, clouds, land and any water are imagined, and so is the colour of its surface.
2.8×as wide as our Sun looks from Earth
78%of the light Earth gets
The sky from Kepler-1649c
Kepler-1649 would look 2.8× as wide as the Sun does from Earth, and the planet gets 78% of the light Earth gets from the Sun.
Its colour comes from its surface temperature of 3 240 K (2 970 °C); the Sun's is about 5 772 K (5 500 °C).
How fast Kepler-1649c spins is unknown, so the length of its day is too.
Apparent size = star radius ÷ orbit; light = size² × (temperature ÷ 5 772 K)⁴. Both from the values on this page. The landscape is imagined.
Kepler-1649c is a planet almost exactly the size of Earth, 1.06 times its radius, orbiting a small red dwarf about 300 light-years away in Cygnus. It circles every 19.5 days and receives about 75% of the starlight Earth gets from the Sun. When NASA announced it in April 2020, it said that no other planet found in a habitable zone was closer to Earth in both size and temperature together. For years it had sat in the Kepler mission’s pile of false alarms.
Found in the reject pile
The Kepler space telescope picked up so many possible signals of planets passing in front of their stars that a computer program, the Robovetter, sorted them, flagging the ones that did not look like real planets. It filed the 19.5-day signal from Kepler-1649 as a false positive.
The mistake came from the star’s motion. Kepler-1649 moves fast across our sky, 168.2 milliarcseconds a year, and over the years of observation the patch of pixels used to measure its light had drifted about half a pixel off target. Members of the Kepler False Positive Working Group, checking the computer’s rejects by hand, noticed that the signal was real. In 2020 Vanderburg and colleagues published it: an Earth-sized planet, validated statistically with a false-positive probability of about 0.2%.
A Venus and an Earth
Its star is a mid M dwarf, 0.23 times the Sun’s radius and only 3 240 K (2 970 °C), giving off about half a percent of the Sun’s light. Closer in orbits a second known planet, Kepler-1649 b, about the size of Earth but receiving more than twice Earth’s sunlight, which the discoverers likened to Venus. The two orbits are in an almost exact rhythm: the outer planet’s year is 2.248 times the inner one’s, only 0.08% short of the ratio 9:4. That hints at a third planet between them, with a 13-day orbit, too small or too tilted to have been seen.
Even the size of its orbit is uncertain. The archive lists 0.065 AU, taken from an older Kepler table. A 2021 study by Kane and colleagues derived 0.083 AU from the discovery paper’s star, and only that value matches the published 75% of Earth’s sunlight.
Could it hold water?
Nobody knows what its atmosphere is like, or whether it has one. Its equilibrium temperature is about 234 K (-39 °C), an estimate that leaves out any warming by air. In climate models with an atmosphere, Kane’s team found average surface temperatures between about 245 and 305 K (32 °C), with some liquid water in every case they ran. Whether its spin is locked to its star, with one side in endless day, is not known either: the models tried both locked and unlocked rotation. A 2025 study found that both planets could have kept atmospheres for billions of years. Red dwarfs often flare, which may make life difficult, but NASA notes that no flares have been seen from this star.
Its orbit, to scale
Kepler-1649c goes around once every 20 days, at 0.0827 AU from its star. The whole view is tiny on Solar System scale: Mercury orbits the Sun about 5 times farther out than the outermost orbit shown here.
Earth days passing: 0
How hot is it?
Earth (average)288 K · 15 °C
Water boils373 K · 100 °C
Venus surface737 K · 464 °C
Iron melts1 811 K · 1 540 °C
Sun's surface5 772 K · 5 500 °C
Kepler-1649c234 K · -39 °C
Kepler-1649c: equilibrium temperature. Logarithmic scale from 100 K to 10 000 K. Reference values: NASA, IAU.
How long to get there?
Kepler-1649c is about 300 light-years away.
Light299 792 km/s300 years
Breakthrough Starshotplanned light sail, 20% of light speed1 500 years
Parker Solar Probefastest spacecraft so far, 192 km/s468 425 years
Voyager 1leaving the Solar System, 17 km/s5.3 million years
At Voyager 1's speed the trip would take about 66 131 human lifetimes of 80 years. Bars are on a logarithmic scale. Speeds: NASA, Breakthrough Initiatives.
Gallery
An Earth-sized planet with brown land under scattered white clouds, its right edge lit by a tiny red star in black space, an impression of Kepler-1649c. AI-generated painting.A large, dull red-orange sun hanging over a dark, rocky landscape with shallow pools that reflect its red light, an impression of the sky from Kepler-1649c. AI-generated painting.Kepler-1649c, 3D artist's impression, rendered from the interactive model.Kepler-1649c, 3D artist's impression, from another angle, rendered from the interactive model.Kepler-1649c, 3D artist's impression, close-up, rendered from the interactive model.
Timeline
2013Kepler finishes watching Kepler-1649, 756 days in all.
2017The inner planet, Kepler-1649 b, is validated and called a Venus analogue.
2018Kepler's Robovetter files the 19.5-day signal as a false alarm.
2020Vanderburg and colleagues rescue it; NASA announces it on 15 April.
2021Climate models find liquid water possible in every case run.
2025A study finds both planets could have kept atmospheres for billions of years.
Questions people ask
How far away is Kepler-1649c?
About 300 light-years, in the constellation Cygnus.
Could Kepler-1649c support life?
Nobody knows. It is Earth-sized, in its star's habitable zone, and gets about 75% of Earth's sunlight, but its atmosphere is unknown and red dwarfs are prone to flares. Climate models that give it an atmosphere find liquid water possible.
How was Kepler-1649c discovered?
In old Kepler data. A computer program had filed the signal as a false positive; people in the Kepler False Positive Working Group checked it again and recognised a planet.