Exoplanets

Exomoons

Moons around planets of other stars: almost certainly out there, never yet confirmed

No confirmed detection Artist's impression · drag to rotate
Confirmed exomoons none every candidate is still disputed (Nature, 2026) [9]
Best-known candidate Kepler-1625b I about 4 Earth radii, Neptune-sized [1]
Its planet about 11.4 Earth radii Jupiter-sized, orbiting a Sun-like star [1]
Distance about 8 000 light-years in Cygnus; estimates range from 7 500 to 8 200 [3]
Evidence one Hubble transit, October 2017 the planet arrived 77.8 minutes early [1]
Second candidate Kepler-1708 b-i about 2.6 Earth radii (2022) [5]
Strongest new case (2026) orbits a brown dwarf at least 0.9 Jupiter masses, every 170 days [10]
Smallest moons ruled out 0.1 Earth radii around LP 890-9c, from 12 JWST transits [11]

About the image. Drawn as a large, hazy blue moon beside a banded gas giant, as the Kepler-1625b candidate would be if it is real. Only the sizes come from the candidate's transit data; the moon's colour, atmosphere and surface, and the planet's bands, are all imagined.

Moons are everywhere in the Solar System. Among the thousands of planets found around other stars there are almost certainly moons too, but as of 2026 not a single one has been confirmed. A Nature paper published in July 2026 says it plainly: no exomoon has ever been confidently detected.

How you would find one

Most exoplanets are found by the transit method: a planet passes in front of its star and dims it slightly. A moon would leave two traces. It could add its own small dip to the light, and its pull would make the planet arrive a little early or late. Both effects are tiny, and both can be mimicked by noise, by spots on the star or by the way the data are processed.

A moon the size of Neptune

The most famous candidate orbits Kepler-1625b, a Jupiter-sized planet around a Sun-like star about 8 000 light-years away in Cygnus. In 2017 Teachey, Kipping and Schmitt found a hint of a moon in Kepler’s data. The Hubble Space Telescope then watched one transit, in October 2017. The planet arrived 77.8 minutes early, and the light curve showed a second, shallow dip. In 2018 they reported a candidate moon about 4 times Earth’s radius, as big as Neptune, circling at about 40 times the planet’s radius. Nothing like it exists in the Solar System.

Others were not convinced. In 2019 Kreidberg, Luger and Bedell processed the same Hubble data again and found that a planet with no moon fitted just as well. They called the moon’s dip likely an artifact of the data reduction.

In 2022 Kipping’s team reported a second candidate, Kepler-1708 b-i, about 2.6 Earth radii across, the only survivor of a search of 70 cool giant planets. It rests on just two transits. In late 2023 Heller and Hippke concluded that neither planet is likely to have a large moon, blaming the fitting of the star’s edge for one signal and the star’s own activity for the other. Kipping and colleagues replied that both remain viable.

What the newest telescopes see

The James Webb Space Telescope has joined the search. In 2025 it watched a 60-hour transit of Kepler-167e, a cold Jupiter-like planet. Seven of twelve ways of analysing the data showed a strong moon signal, but a starspot crossing explained it equally well, and the team asked for another look at the next transit, in October 2027. In 2026 twelve Webb transits of the rocky planet LP 890-9c ruled out moons down to 0.1 Earth radii, small enough to exclude a twin of Europa.

The strongest new case, announced in July 2026, does not orbit a planet at all. Using ESO’s Very Large Telescope, Hoy, Zurlo and colleagues found a body of at least 0.9 Jupiter masses circling a brown dwarf, itself over 30 times Jupiter’s mass, every 170 days. ESO called it a possible first exomoon, “if confirmed”, while noting that the word “moon” may not really fit.

Gallery

A hazy blue moon on the left, lit by a small yellow star beside it, with the cream-coloured edge of a much larger gas giant filling the right of the picture, an impression of a Neptune-sized exomoon like the candidate around Kepler-1625b. AI-generated painting.
The edge of a giant banded gas planet fills the upper right of a black sky, with a small bright sun just beside its rim, above the grey, rocky horizon of a moon, an impression of the view from an exomoon. AI-generated painting.
Exomoons, 3D artist's impression, rendered from the interactive model.
Exomoons, 3D artist's impression, from another angle, rendered from the interactive model.
Exomoons, 3D artist's impression, close-up, rendered from the interactive model.

Timeline

  1. 2017 Teachey, Kipping and Schmitt find a hint of a moon around Kepler-1625b; Hubble watches a transit in October.
  2. 2018 The Hubble result is published: a candidate moon the size of Neptune.
  3. 2019 A reanalysis of the same Hubble data finds no need for a moon.
  4. 2022 A second candidate, Kepler-1708 b-i, is reported.
  5. 2023 Heller and Hippke conclude neither candidate is likely; Kipping's team replies in 2024.
  6. 2026 A body of at least 0.9 Jupiter masses is found orbiting a brown dwarf; JWST rules out small moons around LP 890-9c.

Questions people ask

Has an exomoon ever been confirmed?

No. A July 2026 Nature paper states that no exomoon has ever been confidently detected and that every candidate is still disputed.

What is the most famous exomoon candidate?

Kepler-1625b I, a candidate about four times Earth's radius, as big as Neptune, around a Jupiter-sized planet. It rests mainly on one Hubble transit in October 2017, and other teams read the signal as an artifact.

How do astronomers look for moons around exoplanets?

Mostly with transits: they look for an extra small dip in the star's light and for the planet arriving early or late. Newer methods track the wobble of a companion with radial velocity or astrometry.

Sources

  1. Teachey & Kipping (2018), Evidence for a large exomoon orbiting Kepler-1625b, Science Advances 4, eaav1784
  2. Teachey, Kipping & Schmitt (2017), HEK VI: On the Dearth of Galilean Analogs in Kepler and the Exomoon Candidate Kepler-1625b I, AJ
  3. STScI / NASA (2018), Astronomers Find First Evidence of Possible Moon Outside Our Solar System
  4. Kreidberg, Luger & Bedell (2019), No Evidence for Lunar Transit in New Analysis of Hubble Space Telescope Observations of the Kepler-1625 System, ApJL 877, L15
  5. Kipping et al. (2022), An exomoon survey of 70 cool giant exoplanets and the new candidate Kepler-1708 b-i, Nature Astronomy 6, 367
  6. Heller & Hippke (2024), Large exomoons unlikely around Kepler-1625 b and Kepler-1708 b, Nature Astronomy 8, 193
  7. Kipping et al. (2024), A Reply to: Large Exomoons unlikely around Kepler-1625 b and Kepler-1708 b
  8. Kipping et al. (2025), A JWST Transit of a Jupiter Analog: II. A Search for Exomoons
  9. Hoy, Zurlo et al. (2026), Planetary-mass exosatellite detected around the substellar companion of a star, Nature
  10. ESO (2026), New 'exomoon' detection challenges cosmic labels
  11. Kipping (2026), JWST Excludes Exomoons Down to 0.1 Earth Radii Around a Rocky, Temperate Exoplanet
  12. NASA Exoplanet Archive: Planetary Systems Composite Parameters